<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front><article-meta>
<title-group><article-title>Maize Disease Detection: Multi-Format Image Analysis Using Deep Learning for Precise Diagnosis</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Hasada</surname><given-names>Kuna</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sing</surname><given-names>Antaryami</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mallick</surname><given-names>Basudev</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sing</surname><given-names>Dharamendra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">Department of Computer Engineering, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.</aff>
</contrib-group>
<abstract><p>This research introduces a comprehensive deep learning strategy designed for identifying maize diseases, utilizing RGB, grayscale, and segmented images to enhance classification precision and dependability. By utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), the model was trained on a dataset featuring prominent maize diseases, such as Cercospora leaf spot, Common rust, Northern leaf blight, along with healthy maize foliage. The study implements a multi-format ensemble approach that takes advantage of a majority voting system to merge predictions from all image formats, resulting in a remarkable classification accuracy of 94.3%. This approach surpasses models based on single formats and offers a scalable, instantaneous solution for the early detection of maize diseases. The integration of image processing, feature extraction, and deep learning guarantees strong performance across various disease types, making it a valuable resource for agricultural practices and early intervention. The results emphasize the potential to improve crop management strategies, especially in areas where prompt disease detection is vital for preserving crop yield and quality.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><kwd>Maize disease detection</kwd><kwd>Deep learning</kwd><kwd>Multi-format analysis</kwd><kwd>Ensemble learning</kwd><kwd>Plant pathology</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec id="sec-1"><label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
<p>Maize, a globally significant crop, is crucial to global food security and economic stability. Its 1.1 billion metric tons in 2020 production volume makes it the most cultivated cereal grain worldwide <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-1">[1]</xref>. It serves as a staple food for over a billion people and is integral to biofuel production, animal feed, and various industrial applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-2">[2]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-3">[3]</xref>.</p>
<p>However, maize is susceptible to many diseases, including Cercospora leaf Spot, Common rust, and Northern leaf blight, which can significantly reduce its yield and quality, causing substantial economic losses globally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-4">[4]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-5">[5]</xref>.</p>
<p>Among the most destructive maize diseases are Fusarium ear rot, caused by Fusarium verticillioides, which can reduce maize yields by up to 70% while also contaminating crops with harmful mycotoxins, and Maize Lethal Necrosis (MLN), a disease caused by the co-infection of the maize chlorotic mottle virus and sugarcane mosaic virus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-6">[6]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-7">[7]</xref>. Since its first detection in 2011, MLN has caused widespread damage, particularly in East Africa, spreading to countries like Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-8">[8]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-9">[9]</xref>. These diseases emphasize the urgent need for early and accurate disease diagnosis to manage their impact on crop production and ensure food security <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-10">[10]</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-11">[11]</xref>.</p>
<p>Traditional disease detection methods, such as manual inspection, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to errors, often resulting in delayed interventions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-12">[12]</xref>. In contrast, advances in deep learning, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have transformed disease detection by enabling automated, precise analysis of leaf images <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-13">[13]</xref>. These models can incorporate various image formats like RGB, grayscale, and segmented images, providing complementary insights that improve accuracy and robustness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-14">[14]</xref>.</p>
<p>This study explores an integrated approach combining image processing and machine learning to detect maize diseases effectively. By employing advanced preprocessing techniques, feature extraction, and deep learning models, our methodology aims to achieve high accuracy in disease classification. This research aims to develop a robust, scalable solution for early disease detection, empowering farmers to manage maize diseases more effectively and enhance crop productivity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-2"><label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<p>This study converts a single maize leaf image into three formats: 1) RGB, 2) grayscale, and 3) segmented. Data augmentation techniques like rotation and flipping were applied, and all images were resized to 244×244 pixels. Each image format is processed by a separate CNN, and the final disease class prediction is determined using a majority voting mechanism. The model achieved an accuracy of 94.3%, demonstrating the effectiveness of the multi-format approach for maize disease detection.</p>
<fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Workflow for maize disease detection using RGB, grayscale, and segmented image processing.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://scfa.reapress.com/public/journals/1/jats-figures/39/fig-1-4702c2ba6d8a.jpg"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-3"><label>3</label><title>Figures and Tables</title>
<sec id="sec-4"><label>3.1</label><title>Dataset Preparation</title>
<p>The dataset utilized for this study comprised 4,000 maize leaf images, categorized into four distinct classes: 1) Cercospora leaf spot (1,000 images), 2) Common rust (1,000 images), 3) Northern leaf blight (1,000 images), and 4) healthy leaves (1,000 images).</p>
<p>Data augmentation techniques such as rotation, flipping, and zooming were applied to enhance the model&apos;s ability to generalize, introducing variability into the training data. All images were resized to a uniform dimension of 244×244 pixels, ensuring compatibility with the CNN architecture. Segmented images were additionally generated by applying HSV color thresholding, effectively isolating regions of interest associated with diseased areas.</p>
<fig id="fig2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Visualization of RGB, grayscale, and segmented images for maize disease detection dataset.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://scfa.reapress.com/public/journals/1/jats-figures/39/fig-2-0b08f1294f51.jpg"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-5"><label>3.2</label><title>Ensemble Voting</title>
<p>To enhance robustness, predictions from the three image formats (RGB, grayscale, and segmented) were combined using an ensemble majority voting approach. Each format was processed independently through the CNN, and the final output was determined based on the class agreed upon by at least two formats.</p>
<fig id="fig3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Disease prediction based on majority voting.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://scfa.reapress.com/public/journals/1/jats-figures/39/fig-3-5b844f66c2fc.png"/></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-6"><label>3.3</label><title>Evaluation Metrics</title>
<p>The model&apos;s performance was evaluated using accuracy (Overall correctness), precision (True positives among predicted positives), recall (Ability to identify actual positives), and F1-score (Harmonic mean of precision and recall).</p>
<table-wrap id="tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Performance metrics for different images.</p></caption><graphic content-type="pdf-region" xlink:href="pdf-region:3:66,615.6,537.1,684.1"/><p content-type="note">This table is shown in the PDF version of the article.</p></table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-7"><label>4</label><title>Conclusion and Future Scope</title>
<p>This study uses deep learning to present a multi-format image analysis approach for maize disease detection. By combining RGB, grayscale, and segmented images, the model achieved an accuracy of 94.3%. CNNs and ensemble voting significantly improved the model&apos;s reliability, providing an effective and scalable solution for early disease detection. This can help reduce crop losses and enhance agricultural productivity.</p>
<p>Future work can focus on refining the model&apos;s accuracy by exploring advanced deep learning architectures and improving image preprocessing. The model can also be expanded to detect a wider range of diseases and applied to other crops. Integrating real-time monitoring systems and developing mobile apps could make the technology more accessible to farmers, promoting timely interventions and supporting sustainable agriculture.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-8"><title>Author Contributaion</title>
<sec id="sec-9"><title>Kuna Hasada</title>
<p>Conceptualized the research, designed the methodology, and wrote the manuscript draft</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-10"><title>Antaryami Sing</title>
<p>Contributed to data collection, preprocessing, and augmentation</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-11"><title>Basudev Mallick</title>
<p>Implemented the CNN models, performed the experiments, and analyzed the results</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-12"><title>Dharamendra Sing</title>
<p>Provided technical insights on ensemble learning and image processing</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-13"><title>Funding</title>
<p>No specific funding was received for this research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-14"><title>Data Availability</title>
<p>The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from Kuna Hasada.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec-15"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="ref-1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K., &amp; Prasanna, B. M. (2022). Global maize production, consumption and trade: Trends and R&amp;D implications. Food security, 14(5), 1295–1319. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01288-7</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Dhugga, K. S. (2007). Maize biomass yield and composition for biofuels. Crop science, 47(6), 2211–2227. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0299">https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0299</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Ostrander, B. (2015). Maize starch for industrial applications. In Industrial crops. handbook of plant breeding ( pp. 171–189). Springer, New York, NY. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1447-0_9">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1447-0_9</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Martin, D. P., &amp; Shepherd, D. N. (2009). The epidemiology, economic impact and control of maize streak disease. Food security, 1, 305–315. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0023-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0023-1</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Logrieco, A., Battilani, P., Leggieri, M. C., Jiang, Y., Haesaert, G., Lanubile, A., … ., &amp; Pasti, M. (2021). Perspectives on global mycotoxin issues and management from the MycoKey maize working group. Plant disease, 105(3), 525–537. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1322-FE">https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-20-1322-FE</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Mesterházy, Á., Lemmens, M., &amp; Reid, L. M. (2012). Breeding for resistance to ear rots caused by Fusarium spp. in maize–a review. Plant breeding, 131(1), 1–19. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01936.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01936.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Carvajal-Moreno, M. (2022). Mycotoxin challenges in maize production and possible control methods in the 21st century. Journal of cereal science, 103, 103293. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103293">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103293</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fatma, H. K., Tileye, F., &amp; Patrick, A. N. (2016). Insights of maize lethal necrotic disease: A major constraint to maize production in East Africa. African journal of microbiology research, 10(9), 271–279. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7534">https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7534</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ekwomadu, T. I., &amp; Mwanza, M. (2023). Fusarium fungi pathogens, identification, adverse effects, disease management, and global food security: A review of the latest research. Agriculture, 13(9), 1810. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091810">https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091810</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Singh, V. K., Singh, R., Kumar, A., &amp; Bhadouria, R. (2021). Current status of plant diseases and food security. In Food security and plant disease management (pp. 19–35). Elsevier. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821843-3.00019-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821843-3.00019-2</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Kalunga, P., &amp; Kunda, D. (2024). Investigation of the suitability of existing maize plant leaf disease detection and classification approaches: Challenges and open issues. Zambia information and communication technology journal, 8(1), 70–79. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.33260/zictjournal.v8i1.343">https://doi.org/10.33260/zictjournal.v8i1.343</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Attri, I., Awasthi, L. K., Sharma, T. P., &amp; Rathee, P. (2023). A review of deep learning techniques used in agriculture. Ecological informatics, 77, 102217. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102217">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102217</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Bhise, D., Kumar, S., &amp; Mohapatra, H. (2022). Review on deep learning-based plant disease detection. 2022 6th international conference on electronics, communication and aerospace technology (pp. 1106–1111). IEEE. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009290">https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECA55336.2022.10009290</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref-14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Mishra, S. R., Mohapatra, H., &amp; Saxena, S. (2024). Leveraging data analytics and a deep learning framework for advancements in image super-resolution techniques: From classic interpolation to cutting-edge approaches. In Data analytics and machine learning: Navigating the big data landscape (pp. 105–126). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0448-4_6">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0448-4_6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list></back>
</article>