An Explainable AI–Driven Type-2 Fuzzy Decision Support Framework for Sustainable Energy Management in Smart Grids
Abstract
The increasing integration of renewable energy resources, distributed energy systems, and intelligent monitoring technologies has transformed traditional power networks into complex smart-grid environments. Although Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) techniques have significantly improved forecasting accuracy and operational efficiency, the lack of transparency in many AI models remains a major challenge for critical energy-management applications. In addition, the inherent uncertainty associated with renewable energy generation, electricity demand, and market conditions further complicates decision-making processes in smart grids. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)–Driven Type-2 Fuzzy Decision Support Framework for sustainable energy management in smart grids. The proposed framework integrates Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)-based forecasting, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference System (IT2FIS) into a unified architecture. First, the forecasting module predicts future electricity demand and renewable energy generation using historical operational and environmental data. Subsequently, SHAP is employed to provide both global and local explanations by quantifying the contribution of input variables to forecasting outcomes. The extracted explainability information is then incorporated into the Type-2 fuzzy decision-support module, which generates interpretable and uncertainty-aware energy-management actions under dynamic operating conditions. The proposed framework aims to simultaneously improve prediction accuracy, enhance transparency, and increase the robustness of decision-making in the presence of uncertainty. Performance evaluation is designed using standard forecasting metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and the coefficient of determination (R²), together with sustainability-oriented indicators such as Renewable Energy Utilization rate (REU), Peak Load Reduction (PLR), Energy Cost Saving Ratio (CSR), and Carbon Emission Reduction (CER). Compared with conventional ML and Type-1 fuzzy approaches, the proposed framework is expected to provide more reliable predictions, greater interpretability, and improved sustainability performance. The findings of this study contribute to the development of trustworthy and human-centered intelligent energy-management systems and provide a promising pathway toward transparent, resilient, and sustainable smart-grid operation.
Keywords:
Explainable artificial intelligence, Smart grid, Sustainable energy management, Type-2 Fuzzy Logic, SHAP, XGBoost, Decision support system, Renewable energyReferences
- [1] Yussuf, R. O., & Asfour, O. S. (2024). Applications of artificial intelligence for energy efficiency throughout the building lifecycle: An overview. Energy and buildings, 305, 113903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.113903
- [2] E, M., R, N., & Satheesh, R. (2025). Deep learning-based load forecasting in smart grid. 2025 emerging technologies for intelligent systems (ETIS) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETIS64005.2025.10961160
- [3] Yigit, Y., Ferrag, M. A., Ghanem, M. C., Sarker, I. H., Maglaras, L. A., Chrysoulas, C., … ., & Janicke, H. (2025). Generative AI and LLMs for Critical infrastructure protection: Evaluation benchmarks, agentic AI, challenges, and opportunities. Sensors, 25(6), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25061666
- [4] Kandula, R., Dandamudi, J. T., Raj, R. D. A., Yanamala, R. M. R., & Prakasha, K. K. (2026). Explainable AI for smart grid intelligence: A comprehensive review of techniques, applications and future directions. Energy and ai, 25, 100820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2026.100820
- [5] Song, Z., Cao, S., & Yang, H. (2024). An interpretable framework for modeling global solar radiation using tree-based ensemble machine learning and Shapley additive explanations methods. Applied energy, 364, 123238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123238
- [6] Hu, H., Yu, S. S., & Trinh, H. (2024). A review of uncertainties in power systems—modeling, impact, and mitigation. Designs, 8(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8010010
- [7] Bai, K., Zhang, W., Wen, S., Zhao, C., Meng, W., Zeng, Y., & Jia, D. (2024). A data-knowledge-driven interval type-2 fuzzy neural network with interpretability and self-adaptive structure. Information sciences, 660, 120133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120133
- [8] Nishanth, F. P., Dash, S. K., & Mahapatro, S. R. (2024). Critical study of type-2 fuzzy logic control from theory to applications: A state-of-the-art comprehensive survey. E-prime - advances in electrical engineering, electronics and energy, 10, 100771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100771
- [9] Niskanen, V. A. (2024). Methodological aspects on integrating fuzzy systems with explainable artificial intelligence. In Advances in artificial intelligence-empowered decision support systems: Papers in honour of professor john psarras (pp. 415–438). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62316-5_16
- [10] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). World energy outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
- [11] Wang, F., & Nishter, Z. (2024). Real-time load forecasting and adaptive control in smart grids using a hybrid neuro-fuzzy approach. Energies, 17(11), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17112539
- [12] Aljohani, T. (2024). Intelligent Type-2 Fuzzy logic controller for hybrid microgrid energy management with different modes of EVs integration. Energies, 17(12), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17122949